Soluble immune checkpoint factors reflect exhaustion of antitumor immunity and response to PD-1 blockade.

BACKGROUNDPrecise stratification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is needed for appropriate application of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.METHODSWe measured soluble forms of the immune-checkpoint molecules PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC before PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. A prospective biomarker-finding trial (cohort A) included 50 previously treated patients who received nivolumab. A retrospective observational study was performed for patients treated with any PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy (cohorts B and C), cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort D), or targeted therapy (cohort E). Plasma samples from all patients were assayed for soluble immune-checkpoint molecules with a highly sensitive chemiluminescence-based assay.RESULTSNonresponsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy was associated with higher concentrations of these soluble immune factors among patients with immune-reactive (hot) tumors. Such an association was not apparent for patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Integrative analysis of tumor size, PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue (tPD-L1), and gene expression in tumor tissue and peripheral CD8+ T cells revealed that high concentrations of the 3 soluble immune factors were associated with hyper or terminal exhaustion of antitumor immunity. The combination of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) and sCTLA-4 efficiently discriminated responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade among patients with immune-reactive tumors.CONCLUSIONCombinations of soluble immune factors might be able to identify patients unlikely to respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a result of terminal exhaustion of antitumor immunity. Our data suggest that such a combination better predicts, along with tPD-L1, for the response of patients with NSCLC.TRIAL REGISTRATIONUMIN000019674.FUNDINGThis study was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Sysmex Corporation.

Comparison of hemostatic ability between spray coagulation and forced coagulation modes in endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled trial (Spray-G trial).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for early gastric neoplasms (EGN). Controlling intraoperative bleeding is crucial for ensuring safe and reliable procedures. ESD using the spray coagulation mode (SCM-ESD) has been developed to control bleeding more effectively than ESD using the conventional forced coagulation mode (FCM-ESD). This study aims to compare the hemostatic efficacies of SCM-ESD and FCM-ESD. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, parallel, randomized, open-label superiority trial will be conducted in five Japanese institutions. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of intramucosal EGC will be randomized to undergo either SCM-ESD or FCM-ESD. The primary outcome measure is the completion of ESD with an electrosurgical knife alone, without the use of hemostatic forceps. Secondary outcomes include the number and duration of hemostasis using hemostatic forceps, procedure time, curability, and safety. A total of 130 patients will be enrolled in this study. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide evidence on the hemostatic efficacy of SCM-ESD compared with FCM-ESD in patients with intramucosal EGN, potentially improving the safety and reliability of ESD procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered at the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registration (UMIN-CTR) as UMIN000040518. The reception number is R000054009.

Efficacy, safety, and biomarker analysis of nivolumab in combination with abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in patients with HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study (WJOG11418B NEWFLAME trial).

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer is a disease for which no immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promise as effective therapies. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors synergistically increased the effectiveness of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies in preclinical studies. METHODS: This non-randomized, multicohort, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab 240 mg administered every 2 weeks in combination with the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily and either fulvestrant (FUL) or letrozole (LET) as a first-line or second-line treatment for HR-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Blood, tissue, and fecal samples were collected at multiple points for correlative studies to evaluate immunity biomarkers. RESULTS: From June 2019 to early study termination due to safety concerns on July 2020, 17 patients were enrolled (FUL: n=12, LET: n=5). One patient with a prior treatment history in the FUL cohort was excluded. ORRs were 54.5% (6/11) and 40.0% (2/5) in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. Treatment-emergent (TE) adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 occurred in 11 (92%) and 5 (100%) patients in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs were neutropenia (7 (58.3%) and 3 (60.0%) in the FUL and LET cohorts, respectively), followed by alanine aminotransferase elevation (5 (41.6%) and 4 (80.0%)). One treatment-related death from interstitial lung disease occurred in the LET cohort. Ten patients developed liver-related grade ≥3 AEs. Liver biopsy specimens from 3 patients showed hepatitis characterized by focal necrosis with predominant CD8+ lymphocyte infiltration. Marked elevation of tumor necrosis factor-related cytokines and interleukin-11, and a decrease in peripheral regulatory T cells (Tregs), were observed in patients with hepatotoxicity. These findings suggest that treatment-related toxicities were immune-related AEs likely caused by proinflammatory cytokine production and suppression of Treg proliferation due to the addition of abemaciclib to nivolumab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Although the combination of nivolumab and abemaciclib was active, it caused severe and prolonged immune-related AEs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-194782, jRCT2080224706, UMIN000036970.

Efficacy of probiotics and trimebutine maleate for abemaciclib-induced diarrhea: A randomized, open-label phase II trial (MERMAID, WJOG11318B).

BACKGROUND: Abemaciclib-induced diarrhea (AID) impairs quality of life (QOL) and treatment adherence in patients with breast cancer. Supportive treatment with loperamide is associated with constipation. We hypothesized that probiotics and trimebutine maleate (TM) would decrease the frequency of AID without causing constipation. METHODS: Hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor 2-negative advanced breast cancer patients were randomized into the probiotic Bifidobacterium (A) or probiotic Bifidobacterium and TM (B) groups. Endocrine therapy, Abemaciclib and probiotic Bifidobacterium three times a day for 28 days, was administered to both arms. Arm B was treated with TM upon the onset of diarrhea. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who experienced grade ≥2 diarrhea. The secondary endpoints were safety, frequency, and duration of all-grade diarrhea; frequency of emesis and constipation; usage of loperamide; and health-related QOL/patient-reported outcome during the study. We evaluated whether the primary endpoint of each arm exceeded the predetermined threshold. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients completed treatment. Grade 2 diarrhea occurred in 52% and 50% of patients in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. One patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea in each arm. The median duration of grade2 diarrhea was 2 and 2.5day, and only one patient required dose reduction. Grade ≥2 constipation was observed in 4% of Arm A and 3.6% of Arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic Bifidobacterium or the combination of probiotic Bifidobacterium with TM did not decrease the incidence of grade 2 or greater diarrhea compared with historical control, although the grade 3 or greater diarrhea was reduced. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT (Japan registry of clinical trials). jRCTs031190154.

Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of prophylactic olanzapine for patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving T-DXd treatment: protocol for the ERICA study (WJOG14320B).

INTRODUCTION: The antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) has led to a change in the clinical management of breast cancer. Nausea and vomiting are the most common adverse events of T-DXd, which cannot be completely alleviated by standard prophylactic regimens. Olanzapine is particularly effective in preventing delayed nausea caused by chemotherapy. In this study, we will evaluate the efficacy of olanzapine in managing persistent nausea and vomiting during T-DXd treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ERICA study is a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised phase II study with the aim to evaluate the antiemetic effects of the prophylactic olanzapine (5 mg orally, on days 1-6) or placebo combined with a 1,5-hydroxytryptamine-3 (5-HT3)-receptor antagonist and dexamethasone in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer undergoing T-DXd treatment. For a period of 22 days from the day of T-DXd treatment, patients will document their experience in an electronic symptom diary daily during observational periods. The primary endpoint is the complete response rate, defined as no vomiting and no rescue medications during the 'delayed phase' of 24-120 hours post-T-DXd administration. In addition, we define 120-504 hour as the 'persistent phase' and 0-504 hours as the 'overall phase' for secondary endpoint analysis. We have estimated that a total sample size of at least 156 patients is needed to allow a power of 80% at a one-sided significance level of 20% in this study. The target sample size is set to 166 to account for possible case exclusions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol is approved by the West Japan Oncology Group protocol review committee and the SHOWA University Clinical Research Review Board. The study results will be presented at international conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs031210410.

Efficacy and exploratory biomarker analysis of entinostat plus exemestane in advanced or recurrent breast cancer: phase II randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of the oral histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat in Japanese patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced/recurrent breast cancer and to explore potential biomarkers. METHODS: This phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03291886) was conducted at 28 Japanese sites (September 2017-July 2020; interim analysis cutoff: April 2019). Patients with progression/relapse following non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors were randomized 1:1 to entinostat (5 mg/week) or placebo, plus exemestane (25 mg/day). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival; secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. Exploratory biomarker outcomes included lysine acetylation, immune cell profiles, estrogen receptor 1 mutations and plasma chemokines. RESULTS: Of 133 randomized patients, 131 (65 entinostat, 66 placebo) who received study drug were analyzed. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 5.8 (3.2-7.8) months for entinostat and 3.3 (3.1-5.8) months for placebo (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.75 [0.50 - 1.14]; P = 0.189). Median overall survival was not reached in either group. Entinostat tended to prolong progression-free survival in patients aged ≥65 years, not endocrine resistant, or with estrogen receptor 1 Y537S mutation. Candidate biomarkers of efficacy (progression-free survival) included lysine acetylation in CD3+ cells, plasma interferon gamma-induced protein 10, dendritic cell CD86 expression, and CD4+ cell expression of human leukocyte antigen-DR and inducible T-cell co-stimulator. Safety was similar to non-Japanese populations; however, seven entinostat-treated patients (10.8%) had reversible lung injury. CONCLUSIONS: In Japanese patients, the safety of entinostat plus exemestane was acceptable and progression-free survival was prolonged, although not significantly. Exploratory analyses identified potential biomarkers, including lysine acetylation, of efficacy.

Oral formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with advanced solid tumors; a phase 1 study.

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of orally-administered bendamustine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The optimal dosing schedule, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects were also evaluated. A multicenter, open-label trial with a standard 3 + 3 design and dose escalation by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was conducted. The treatment schedules were once daily for 7, 14, and 21 days every 3 weeks as one cycle. The total dose per cycle was increased from 175 to 840 mg/m2. Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days, and one of three patients at 37.5 mg/m2/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m2/day × 21 days. However, the delayed recovery from a decrease in neutrophil or platelet count hampered the start of subsequent treatment cycles, and the trend was more prominent at 37.5 mg/m2/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m2/day × 21 days than in 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days. MTD was determined as 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days to allow acceptable hematologic recovery. The pharmacokinetics of orally-administered bendamustine were generally dose-dependent; however, the inter-individual variability is relatively large. The major adverse events were hematologic toxicities; gastrointestinal disorders were generally mild. Adverse drug reactions did not lead to the discontinuation of the drug. A partial response was observed in two of six patients (prostatic small cell carcinoma and thymic carcinoma) at 75 mg/m2/day × 7 days. The RD and optimal dosing schedule of orally-administered bendamustine was 75 mg/m2 once daily for 7 days every 3 weeks for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03604679. Registration date July 27, 2018).

Hybrid and Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Neoplasms: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD), which incorporates endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with endoscopic mucosal resection, has been developed to make ESD technically easier. This study aimed to determine if H-ESD is superior to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for small early gastric neoplasms (EGNs). METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial to compare the treatment outcomes of H-ESD and C-ESD (Hybrid-G Trial). Patients with differentiated type intramucosal EGN ≤20 mm in diameter and without ulceration were randomly assigned (1:1) to groups that underwent H-ESD or C-ESD. A single multi-functional snare, SOUTEN (ST1850-20, Kaneka, Medix, Tokyo, Japan), was used for H-ESD. The primary outcome was procedure time. Secondary outcomes included mucosal incision time, time and speed of submucosal dissection, curability, and endoscopic procedural adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 39 and 40 patients underwent H-ESD and C-ESD, respectively. The procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (33.16 min vs 62.46 min; H-ESD/C-ESD ratio: 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.69; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in mucosal incision time between the 2 groups; the time and speed of submucosal dissection of H-ESD were significantly shorter than those of C-ESD. No difference was observed between the 2 groups in other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: H-ESD has significantly shorter procedure time than C-ESD, with high and comparable curability and safety for both H-ESD and C-ESD. H-ESD can be a good option for the endoscopic treatment of small EGNs. (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, Numbers: UMIN000041244).

Association of Genetic Polymorphism with Taxane-induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Sub-analysis of a Randomized Phase II Study to Determine the Optimal Dose of 3-week Cycle Nab-Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an important clinical challenge that threatens patients' quality of life. This sub-study of the ABROAD trial investigated the influence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on CIPN, using genotype data from a randomized study to determine the optimal dose of a 3-week-cycle regimen of nab-paclitaxel (q3w nab-PTX) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients with HER2-negative MBC were randomly assigned to three doses of q3w nab-PTX (SD: 260 mg/m2 vs. MD: 220 mg/m2 vs. LD: 180 mg/m2). Five SNPs (EPHA4-rs17348202, EPHA5-rs7349683, EPHA6-rs301927, LIMK2-rs5749248, and XKR4-rs4737264) were analyzed based on the results of a previous genome-wide association study. Per-allele SNP associations were assessed by a Cox regression to model the cumulative dose of nab-PTX up to the onset of severe or worsening sensory neuropathy. A total of 141 patients were enrolled in the parent study; 91(65%) were included in this sub-study. Worsening of CIPN was significantly greater in the cases with XKR4 AC compared to those with a homozygote AA (HR 1.86, 95%CI: 1.00001-3.46, p=0.049). There was no significant correlation of CIPN with any other SNP. A multivariate analysis showed that the cumulative dose of nab-PTX was most strongly correlated with CIPN (p<0.01).

Mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multiplex immunohistochemistry-based single-cell analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a key therapeutic modality for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients experience primary or acquired resistance to these drugs. We here explored the mechanisms underlying both types of ICI resistance by analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four patients who experienced a long-term response to ICI treatment (progression-free survival [PFS] of ≥12 months) followed by disease progression, after which a rebiopsy was immediately performed (cohort-A), as well as four patients who experienced early tumor progression during ICI treatment (PFS of <9 weeks, cohort-B) were enrolled in this retrospective study. The pretreatment TME was evaluated by 16- or 17-color multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC)-based spatial profiling at the single-cell level for both cohorts. In cohort-A, changes in the TME after disease progression during ICI treatment were also investigated by mIHC analysis and transcriptomic analysis. RESULTS: Pretreatment tumor tissue from cohort-B manifested poor infiltration of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells characterized by CD39 and CD103 expression or by programmed cell death-1 expression, implicating insufficient recognition of tumor cells by CD8+ T cells as a mechanism of primary ICI resistance. Analysis of the paired tumor specimens from cohort-A revealed various changes in the TME associated with acquired ICI resistance, including substantial infiltration of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and M2-type tumor-associated macrophages without a marked decline in the number of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells; a decrease in the number of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells; and an apparent decrease in neoantigen presentation by tumor cells. CONCLUSION: The presence of intratumoral tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells may be a prerequisite for a long-term response to ICI treatment in advanced NSCLC, but it is not sufficient for cancer cell eradication. Various TME profiles are associated with acquired ICI resistance, suggesting that patient-specific strategies to overcome such resistance may be necessary.

Data of programmed death-ligand 1 expression and VEGF: Nivolumab, bevacizumab and paclitaxel For HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

The purpose was to explore potential biomarkers of the efficacy and toxicity of triple therapy of nivolumab, bevacizumab and paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Tumor tissues before treatment and blood samples at pretreatment, during and after treatment were collected. The serum samples were used to measure the concentrations of cytokines. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and response were analyzed in association with the biomarker data using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Fifty patients were included in the biomarker analysis. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells and immune cells were evaluated in tumor tissue samples using a Dako 28-8 immunohistochemistry assay and using a VENTANA SP142 immunohistochemistry assay. PD-L1 positive rates using anti-PD-L1 antibodies 28-8 (Combined positive score [CPS] ≥1) and SP142 (Immune cells [IC] ≥1) were 15% and 17%, respectively. The PFS and OS were not significantly different in the subgroups by PD-L1 expression. The median pretreatment vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A concentration was 116.1 pg/ml (range 0-740.23 pg/ml) on day 1 and decreased to <37 pg/ml on day 8 of cycle 1 in all patients. Subtypes (hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative or triple negative breast cancer), stage (recurrent or de novo stage IV) and liver metastasis (yes or no) were not significantly different between patients in VEGF-A high and VEGF-A low groups. PFS in the VEGF-A high group was similar to that in the VEGF-A low group.

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus bevacizumab, paclitaxel for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: Primary results and biomarker data from a phase 2 trial (WJOG9917B).

BACKGROUND: Preclinical models revealed potential synergistic effects of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies. Therefore, we investigated the use of nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel triple therapy for metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: This phase 2, multicentre, single-arm study (NEWBEAT) investigated the safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer, regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression. The primary end-point was objective response rate. Key secondary end-points included progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicities. A biomarker study evaluated tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and serum VEGF-A levels. RESULTS: Between February 2018 and October 2018, 57 patients were enrolled. An objective response rate was seen in 39/56 patients (70%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.9-81.2%), meeting the primary end-point. The objective response rate was 74% in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer versus 59% in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.0 (95% CI 11.0-16.3) and 32.5 (95% CI 26.0-not evaluable) months, respectively (median follow-up: 29.5 months). Grade 3/4 adverse drug reactions occurred in 33 of 57 patients (58%). There were no grade 5 adverse events. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 43 of 57 patients (75%), with grade 3/4 events in eight patients (14%). Biomarker analysis showed that tumour programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was not correlated with the efficacy of triple therapy. Efficacy outcomes were similar between the serum VEGF-high and VEGF-low groups. CONCLUSIONS: First-line nivolumab, bevacizumab, and paclitaxel therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted as a local treatment for gastrointestinal tract tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, hybrid ESD (H-ESD) has been performed for colorectal neoplasms in recent times. However, whether H-ESD is superior to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for patients with early gastric neoplasms (EGN) remains unclear. In this trial, we will compare the treatment outcomes of H-ESD and C-ESD. We hypothesize that the procedure time for H-ESD is shorter than that for C-ESD. METHODS: This is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial to be conducted beginning in August 2020 at nine institutions in Japan. We will determine if H-ESD is superior to C-ESD in terms of procedure time in patients with EGN diagnosed as macroscopically intramucosal (T1a) differentiated carcinoma ≤ 20 mm in diameter without ulcerative findings according to current Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. A total of 82 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the C-ESD or the H-ESD group. The primary outcome is ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes include mucosal incision, time and speed of submucosal dissection, en bloc resection, complete resection, curability, adverse events related to the ESD procedure, extent of dissection before snaring, volume of injection solution, number and time of hemostasis, thickness of the submucosal layer in the resected specimen, and handover to another operator. The stated sample size was determined based on the primary outcome. According to a previous report comparing the procedure times of C-ESD and H-ESD, we hypothesized that H-ESD would provide a 0.2 reduction in logarithmically concerted procedure time (-37%). We estimated that a total of 82 participants were needed to reach a power of 80% for a t-test with a significance level of 0.05 and considering a 10% dropout. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide high-quality data on the benefits and risks of H-ESD for EGN patients. The results of this study could lead to improved outcomes in patients with EGN undergoing ESD. The results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN-CTR UMIN000041244 . Registered on July 29, 2020.

Successful treatment of a case of hormone receptor-positive metastatic extramammary Paget disease with tamoxifen.

Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a rare cutaneous adenocarcinoma that usually is of epidermal origin and shows glandular differentiation and that is treated by wide local excision depending on the disease extent. For widely metastatic disease, however, a standard treatment remains to be established. Similar to breast cancer, EMPD has been found to overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) or hormone receptors (HRs). Whereas HER2-directed therapy was recently shown to be effective for HER2-positive EMPD, the potential role of endocrine therapy for HR-positive EMPD has remained unknown. We here report a case of metastatic EMPD with HR positivity that was successfully treated with the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen. This first-line treatment of systemic metastasis resulted in durable tumor regression for > 20 months without any treatment-related toxicities. This is the first report to reveal the promise of tamoxifen as a safe and effective treatment for HR-positive metastatic EMPD.

Quality of life in a randomized phase II study to determine the optimal dose of 3-week cycle nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To report our findings on quality of life (QoL) in a randomized phase II study to determine the optimal dose of 3-week cycle nab-paclitaxel (q3w nab-PTX) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients with HER2-negative MBC were randomly assigned to three different doses of q3w nab-PTX (SD 260 mg/m2 vs. MD: 220 mg/m2 vs. LD 180 mg/m2). QoL was assessed at baseline and during the second, fourth and sixth courses of treatment using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-Taxane), Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) and EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D). Comparisons were performed with mixed-model repeated measures (MMRM). RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were enrolled in the parent study, and 136 (96%) (44, 45 and 47 in the SD, MD, and LD groups) were included in the analysis. MMRM analysis showed that the difference from the baseline FACT-Taxane trial outcome index at MD and LD were significantly higher than that at SD (MD vs. SD P < 0.001, LD vs. SD P < 0.001). Differences from baseline for FACT-Taxane total, physical and emotional well-being, and taxane subscale scores at MD and LD were also higher than at SD. The difference from baseline for the CFS score at LD was lower than at SD (P = 0.013) and those for EQ-5D utility scores at MD and LD were higher than at SD (MD vs. SD P = 0.011, LD vs. SD P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: QoL of patients treated with 220 or 180 mg/m2 of q3w nab-PTX was significantly better than that of patients treated with 260 mg/m2. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered at the website of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID: UMIN000015516), on 01/11/2014. Details are available at the following address: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000017916.

Pembrolizumab Plus Amrubicin in Patients With Relapsed SCLC: Multi-Institutional, Single-Arm Phase 2 Study.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with relapsed SCLC, amrubicin (AMR) is the current standard treatment in Japan. Nevertheless, its efficacy is not satisfactory and prognosis is poor. Preclinical study suggested that anthracycline agent might induce immunogenic cell death and work synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: Patients with relapsed SCLC who relapsed after completion of platinum-containing regimen were registered. Patients were treated with pembrolizumab (200 mg, flat dose on d 1, every 3 wk for 2 y) plus AMR (40 mg/m2 on d 1-3, every 3 wk until progression). Primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points consisted of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. On the basis of the hypothesis that this treatment will improve ORR from 20% to 40% (0.1 of one-sided α and power of 0.8), 25 patients are required (trial identifier: NCT03253068). RESULTS: Between November 2017 and October 2019, a total of 25 patients were enrolled. Most participants (88%) relapsed within 90 days after platinum-containing therapy and all patients were immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive. ORR, the primary end point, was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.3%-72.2%). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.8-7.0 mo), and PFS rate at 1 year was 14.4%. Median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% CI: 7.3-21.3 mo). Common adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 were neutropenia (64%), leukopenia (40%), and febrile neutropenia (16%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsed SCLC, pembrolizumab plus AMR was effective and tolerable.

Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection with SOUTEN in gastric lesions: An ex vivo porcine model basic study.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) that comprises mucosal incision and partial submucosal dissection followed by snaring in a planned manner, has been developed for endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neoplasms to overcome the technical barrier of ESD. Although the superiority of hybrid ESD with SOUTEN, a single multifunctional device, over conventional ESD has been indicated, the actual effect of snaring itself remains unclear since SOUTEN could be applied to hybrid ESD group, but not to the conventional ESD group, due to ethical issue in clinical practice. AIM: To determine whether and how hybrid ESD was superior to conventional ESD in the endoscopic treatment of gastric lesions in an ex vivo porcine model basic study. METHODS: Sixteen endoscopists participated in this basic study in August 2020 at Kyushu University, performing 32 procedures each for hybrid ESD and conventional ESD. Mock lesions (10-15 mm, diameter) were created in the porcine stomach. The primary outcome was total procedure time and secondary outcomes were en bloc or complete resection, perforation, procedure time/speed for both, mucosal incision, and submucosal dissection. Factors associated with difficulty in ESD including longer procedure time, incomplete resection, and perforation, were also investigated. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively. RESULTS: The median total procedure time of hybrid ESD was significantly shorter than that of conventional ESD (median: 8.3 min vs 16.2 min, P < 0.001). Time, speed, and the amount of hyaluronic acid during submucosal dissection were more favorable in hybrid ESD than conventional ESD (time, 5.2 min vs 10.4 min, P < 0.001; speed, 43.7 mm2/min vs 23.8 mm2/min, P < 0.00; injection volume, 1.5 mL vs 3.0 mL, P < 0.001), although no significant differences in those factors were observed between both groups during mucosal incision. There was also no significant difference between both groups in the en bloc/complete resection rate and perforation rate (complete resection, 93.8% vs 87.5%, P = 0.67; perforation, 0% vs 3.1%, P = 1). Selection of conventional ESD as the treatment method was significantly associated with difficulties during ESD (odds ratio = 10.2; highest among factors). CONCLUSION: Hybrid ESD with SOUTEN improves the treatment outcomes of gastric lesions. It also has the potential to reduce medical costs since SOUTEN is a single multifunctional device that is inexpensive.

Clinical benefit of treatment after trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world multi-centre cohort study in Japan (WJOG12519B).

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1-28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8-72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3-6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4-5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7-27.4). CONCLUSION: The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.